![]() ![]() If numbers are ok, at least for some systems would be good hint. I have some results on SP3 system and on some clean too. Otherwise im using 1024 MB limit, no rLoew patches are involved. even my SS7 machine is fully loaded to 768 MB. It could be in theory problem with my systems, which had lots of mem. they seems to look like some synthetic mistake. but from my experience are not valid for other more modern operation systems, DOS and even not for real user data copy experience. Usually 2/3 rows are just nonsense and which ones its different in every run.Ītto benchmark also reporting very strange numbers for memory card adapters - too high, some for SSD on Sata.Īll these numbers are maybe strange because of some Win98 cache mechanism. CrystalDiskMark Test hard drives reading and writing speedmark. GSmartControl Diagnose, monitor, and benchmark storage devices for optimal performance. after that one results is very bad lesser than smaller blocks (17 MB/s vs. SeaTools for Windows Test hard drive for errors: internal or exteral. with growing size of data block im getting few normal results. It displays basic HDD information, monitors S.M.A.R.T. there is 2x same Road Kill - and i tried it few days ago with real Socket 7 machines + 40 GB IDE Seagate, UDMA 33 were enabled and it really report other number in every run. CrystalDiskInfo is a free HDD health monitoring software for Windows.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |